Scanned on 19 October 2026 at 04:43 UTC
As of , dfpray.com has a GDPR compliance score of 75/100 with 4 pre-consent tracking violations detected.
Only Privacy Score 100 means full compliance. These violations mean that before you could even click the Cookie Consent banner, this website already collected your personal data and shared it with third parties. Learn why this matters (our blog) →
Who is responsible? The website owner is solely responsible for these violations and in general often benefits monetarily (directly or indirectly) from collecting and sharing your data without your consent.
Consent platform: Generic Cookie Consent
Google tags on this page run in Consent Mode with consent denied. They set no cookies but still send cookieless pings to Google before consent.
These are fonts, embeds, and other resources loaded from external servers. While they serve a legitimate purpose, they share your visitors' IP addresses with third parties before consent.
Low-severity concerns: external fonts, empty tag containers, WebSocket connections, and third-party storage.
Services and cookies that comply with GDPR requirements. No consent needed.
Most findings on this page are configuration problems, not catastrophes. These plain-language guides explain what each one means and how to fix it, written for website owners rather than lawyers.
All guides live at gdprscanner.eu/guides.
dfpray.com has a GDPR compliance score of 75/100.
A score between 50 and 79 indicates moderate GDPR compliance issues. Analytics trackers or advertising scripts are likely loading before user consent, which may result in regulatory attention.
26 trackers detected loading before user consent:
Legal basis: This violates GDPR Article 6(1) and LG München I (Case 3 O 17493/20, 20 January 2022). Loading fonts from an external server sends the visitor's IP address to that server. On 20 January 2022 the Munich Regional Court held that a dynamic IP address is personal data for the website operator, and that passing it to Google without consent could not be justified by legitimate interest, because the fonts could be self-hosted. It ordered the operator to stop and to pay the claimant €100 in damages. Self-hosting fonts avoids the issue.
Legal basis: This violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and EDPB Guidelines 2/2023. Even an empty container is third-party code that runs in the visitor's browser and contacts the provider's servers. The EDPB's Guidelines 2/2023 state that Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive applies when code instructs the browser to send information, unless an exemption applies. We list it but do not deduct points, because no tracker fired through it.
This GDPR compliance scan of dfpray.com was performed by GDPR Scanner, a pre-consent privacy scanning tool. The scan captures all trackers, cookies, and third-party scripts that load before a user clicks any consent button.
Under GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), websites must obtain explicit consent before processing personal data. Any tracker or cookie that fires before consent is a potential violation of EU privacy law.
A privacy score of 100/100 means the website loads zero trackers and zero tracking cookies before the user gives consent. This is the standard required by GDPR Article 5(1)(a) and Article 7.
Essential cookies (session management, security tokens) and first-party functional cookies do not incur penalties, as they are covered by the legitimate interest legal basis. See an example: playhth.com scores 100/100.
Legal basis: This violates GDPR Article 6(1) and LG München I (Case 3 O 17493/20). Loading a resource from a third-party server sends the visitor's IP address to that server. The Munich Regional Court held in January 2022 that a dynamic IP address is personal data for the website operator, so passing it on needs a legal basis, and legitimate interest did not cover a resource the site could have hosted itself.
No tracking cookies set before consent were counted as violations.
dfpray.com has 4 GDPR compliance violations with 26 trackers loading before user consent. This level of non-compliance carries meaningful regulatory risk.
Under GDPR Article 83(5), fines can reach €20 million or 4% of worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. Cookie consent failures are also fined under national law: the CNIL fined Google €150 million (2021), Microsoft €60 million (2022) and SHEIN €150 million (2025).
Implementation of a properly configured Consent Management Platform (CMP) that blocks all non-essential scripts until consent is obtained is the recommended remediation step.
dfpray.com scores 75/100 with 4 violation(s) detected. Trackers or cookies were found loading before user consent.
Our scan detected 28 tracker(s) loading before consent, including Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager (Empty Container), challenges.cloudflare.com.
Yes, 4 cookie(s) were detected before the user interacted with any consent banner.
dfpray.com has a GDPR compliance score of 75/100 as of 19 October 2026. A score of 100 means no trackers or cookies that require consent were detected before consent. dfpray.com currently has 4 violation(s) affecting its score.
dfpray.com should implement a Consent Management Platform (CMP) that blocks all non-essential trackers and cookies until the visitor gives explicit consent. This includes configuring tag managers like Google Tag Manager to use consent-aware triggers, self-hosting external fonts, and auditing all third-party scripts. After making changes, re-scan with GDPR Scanner to check the result.