Scanned on 11 July 2026 at 14:41 UTC
As of , piercingexpress.com.br has a GDPR compliance score of 75/100 with 27 pre-consent tracking violations detected.
Only Privacy Score 100 means full compliance. These violations mean that before you could even click the Cookie Consent banner, this website already collected your personal data and shared it with third parties. Learn why this matters (our blog) →
Who is responsible? The website owner is solely responsible for these violations and in general often benefits monetarily (directly or indirectly) from collecting and sharing your data without your consent.
Consent platform: Generic Cookie Banner
These are fonts, embeds, and other resources loaded from external servers. While they serve a legitimate purpose, they share your visitors' IP addresses with third parties before consent.
Low-severity concerns: external fonts, empty tag containers, WebSocket connections, and third-party storage.
Services and cookies that comply with GDPR requirements. No consent needed.
Pending classification by our team. No impact on your privacy score.
These items are pending classification. No impact on your privacy score.
Most findings on this page are configuration problems, not catastrophes. These plain-language guides explain what each one means and how to fix it, written for website owners rather than lawyers.
All guides live at gdprscanner.eu/guides.
piercingexpress.com.br has a GDPR compliance score of 75/100.
A score between 50 and 79 indicates moderate GDPR compliance issues. Analytics trackers or advertising scripts are likely loading before user consent, which may result in regulatory attention.
25 trackers detected loading before user consent:
Legal basis: This violates GDPR Article 44 and LG München I (Case 3 O 17493/20, 20 January 2022). Loading fonts from external servers transmits visitor IP addresses to third-party servers, often outside the EU. The Munich Regional Court ruled on 20 January 2022 that embedding Google Fonts without consent violates GDPR, awarding €100 in damages per visitor. Self-hosting fonts eliminates this violation entirely.
Legal basis: This violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and CNIL Decision SAN-2022-023. Even empty tag manager containers send HTTP requests that transmit visitor IP addresses to third-party servers, constituting device information access without consent. The CNIL has confirmed that any non-essential HTTP request to a third-party server requires prior consent.
This GDPR compliance scan of piercingexpress.com.br was performed by GDPR Scanner, a pre-consent privacy scanning tool. The scan captures all trackers, cookies, and third-party scripts that load before a user clicks any consent button.
Under GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), websites must obtain explicit consent before processing personal data. Any tracker or cookie that fires before consent is a potential violation of EU privacy law.
A privacy score of 100/100 means the website loads zero trackers and zero tracking cookies before the user gives consent. This is the standard required by GDPR Article 5(1)(a) and Article 7.
Essential cookies (session management, security tokens) and first-party functional cookies do not incur penalties, as they are covered by the legitimate interest legal basis. See an example: playhth.com scores 100/100.
Legal basis: This violates GDPR Article 44, Article 46, and LG München I (Case 3 O 17493/20). Exposing visitor IP addresses to third-party servers — especially outside the EU/EEA — without consent or adequate transfer safeguards violates GDPR's data transfer provisions. The Munich Regional Court confirmed that IP addresses constitute personal data and their transfer requires a legal basis.
Legal basis: This violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and CJEU Planet49 (C-673/17). Third-party storage access (localStorage, sessionStorage) on external domains constitutes accessing device information without user consent. The Planet49 ruling confirmed that the ePrivacy Directive's consent requirement applies to all information stored on or accessed from a user's terminal equipment.
Legal basis: This violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and CJEU Planet49 (C-673/17). Third-party storage access (localStorage, sessionStorage) on external domains constitutes accessing device information without user consent. The Planet49 ruling confirmed that the ePrivacy Directive's consent requirement applies to all information stored on or accessed from a user's terminal equipment.
Legal basis: This violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and CJEU Planet49 (C-673/17). Third-party storage access (localStorage, sessionStorage) on external domains constitutes accessing device information without user consent. The Planet49 ruling confirmed that the ePrivacy Directive's consent requirement applies to all information stored on or accessed from a user's terminal equipment.
Legal basis: This violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and CJEU Planet49 (C-673/17). Third-party storage access (localStorage, sessionStorage) on external domains constitutes accessing device information without user consent. The Planet49 ruling confirmed that the ePrivacy Directive's consent requirement applies to all information stored on or accessed from a user's terminal equipment.
Legal basis: This violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and GDPR Article 5(1)(a). Hidden iframes load third-party content invisibly, often for tracking or data collection. This covert processing violates the transparency principle of GDPR Article 5(1)(a) and constitutes accessing device information without consent under ePrivacy Article 5(3).
Legal basis: This violates GDPR Article 44, Article 46, and LG München I (Case 3 O 17493/20). Exposing visitor IP addresses to third-party servers — especially outside the EU/EEA — without consent or adequate transfer safeguards violates GDPR's data transfer provisions. The Munich Regional Court confirmed that IP addresses constitute personal data and their transfer requires a legal basis.
Legal basis: This violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and GDPR Article 5(1)(a). Hidden iframes load third-party content invisibly, often for tracking or data collection. This covert processing violates the transparency principle of GDPR Article 5(1)(a) and constitutes accessing device information without consent under ePrivacy Article 5(3).
✓ No tracking cookies detected before consent. 8 essential/functional cookies were found, which are exempt under legitimate interest.
piercingexpress.com.br has 27 GDPR compliance violations with 25 trackers loading before user consent. This level of non-compliance carries meaningful regulatory risk.
Under GDPR Article 83, supervisory authorities can impose fines of up to €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover, whichever is higher. While fines for consent violations typically range from €10,000 to €500,000, larger organisations have faced fines exceeding €50 million.
Implementation of a properly configured Consent Management Platform (CMP) that blocks all non-essential scripts until consent is obtained is the recommended remediation step.
piercingexpress.com.br scores 75/100 with 27 violation(s) detected. Trackers or cookies were found loading before user consent.
Our scan detected 43 tracker(s) loading before consent, including Google Fonts, Google, static.cloudflareinsights.com.
Yes, 8 cookie(s) were detected before the user interacted with any consent banner.
piercingexpress.com.br has a GDPR compliance score of 75/100 as of 11 July 2026. A score of 100 means no trackers or cookies load before consent. piercingexpress.com.br currently has 27 violation(s) affecting its score.
piercingexpress.com.br should implement a Consent Management Platform (CMP) that blocks all non-essential trackers and cookies until the visitor gives explicit consent. This includes configuring tag managers like Google Tag Manager to use consent-aware triggers, self-hosting external fonts, and auditing all third-party scripts. After making changes, re-scan with GDPR Scanner to verify compliance.